For the lawyers
in the back.

This website and all content herein are protected speech under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Any attempt to restrict, censor, or otherwise limit the publication of content here — through restraining orders, gag orders, or similar legal instruments — constitutes a violation of fundamental constitutional rights and will be challenged to the fullest extent of the law.

Prior restraints are the most serious and least tolerable infringements on First Amendment rights.

— Chief Justice Warren Burger, Nebraska Press Ass'n v. Stuart, 427 U.S. 539 (1976)

"[T]he fact that the public officers named... may be deemed to be impeccable cannot affect the conclusion that the statute imposes an unconstitutional restraint upon publication."

— Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes, Near v. Minnesota, 283 U.S. 697 (1931)

Prior restraint on publication is presumptively unconstitutional.See New York Times Co. v. United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971).

The existence of any civil restraining order, harassment order, or similar legal instrument does not create a general gag order prohibiting truthful speech about public or semi-public individuals. Such orders, to the extent they attempt to restrict protected speech, are unconstitutional prior restraints.

"[T]he barriers to prior restraint remain high and the presumption against its use continues intact."

— Nebraska Press Ass'n v. Stuart, 427 U.S. 539 (1976)

The author expressly reserves the right to discuss their personal experiences with any individual, including those who may have sought legal remedies. Truth is an absolute defense to defamation.

"The Minnesota law was 'the essence of censorship'and the heart of what the First Amendment was designed to prevent."

— Near v. Minnesota, 283 U.S. 697 (1931)

"[E]ven if the liberty of the press is abused by miscreant purveyors of scandal, it 'does not affect the requirement that the press has immunity from previous restraints when it deals with official misconduct.'"

— Near v. Minnesota, 283 U.S. 697 (1931)

Professional individuals who offer services to the public — therapists, coaches, consultants, brokers, and the rest — are subject to public commentary regarding their professional conduct. The public has a legitimate interest in hearing about the experiences of those who have interacted with such professionals.

Nothing on this website constitutes legal advice. The author is not your lawyer, your therapist, your life coach, or your emotional support system. If you need professional assistance, hire a professional.

This website exists for entertainment, cathartic expression, and the fundamental human right to tell one's own story. If you find the content disturbing, consider that perhaps the behavior being described — not the description itself — is the actual problem.

The author resides in Nevada and publishes from Nevada. Any legal disputes arising from this website shall be governed by Nevada law and subject to Nevada jurisdiction. Forum shopping for favorable venues will not be entertained.

This website and its content are protected under applicable anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) statutes. Frivolous legal actions intended to silence protected speech will result in sanctions and attorney's fees being sought against the plaintiff.